As we all know, crisis contingency planning is an extremely important aspect of Public Relations yet it can be a fine line between ensuring a company acts ethically and honestly in a crisis, or presenting an image of acting ethically, when the reverse may be true.
Last week I was permitted to attend crisis planning with one of the worlds largest oil and gas companys. In light of the oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico many company's are ensuring their crisis planning is up to scratch. Going into the meeting i was very cynical of what the company would actually be planning, despite learning the ethics of crisis planning at University, I assumed in the real world crisis planning largely revolved around what not to say, rather than what to say. Yet i was pleasantly surprised by issues and tactics discussed at the meeting.
The main focus of the meeting was discussing a proposal to have outlines of media kits drawn up for journalists. The kits would just need the relevant information filled out in light of a crisis. These kits would include fact sheets on the relevant assets of the company, as well as photos and a media release. They are to be handed out to all relevant media at the first press conference and will provide them with a broad range of information. The consultants followed Eugene Szwajkoski's theory that "Honest disclosure breeds control of information, behaviour, empowerment... and trust" and discussed the importance of open and honest communication between the company and the media, as well as ensuring there is an ongoing flow of information that will continuously provide journalists' with newsworthy information. They even had a list of things that a company's representative should never do in a crisis, such as lieing, trying to shift the blame or avoiding questions.
Othere topics evaluated during the meeting included; setting up a 'ghost' website that would become live in the event of a crisis, creating phonelines for the media, and when and where to hold media conferences.
All in all the experience of attending the meeting was enlightening as it was extremely promising to see the consultants emphasising the importance of honest, two-way, fast communication with the media, rather than brainstorming ways in which to prevent information getting to the media.
1 comment:
I cannot help but ask: How many pages is your crisis plan, and how much of it is devoted to the media?
During recent senate hearings regarding the Gulf of Mexico oil spill, companies like Exxon Mobil testified that BP had made bad decisions and such a disaster would never happen on their watch.
They were caught out when a look at the contingency plans for an emergency in the Gulf of Mexico included plans for walruses, making it obvious they had copied the plans from an Alaskan emergency and made no effort to modify it.
It was also damaging that the plans for dealing with an oil spill took up 9 pages while dealing with the media had 40 pages devoted to it.
The cynic in me thinks it's all well and good to make these plans, but it remains to be seen whether anyone follows it, especially if the crisis at hand is of their own making.
The most modest CEO severance package is still worth more than most of us will earn in a lifetime. As the PR Disasters blog mentions, they're more likely to follow the advice of lawyer over their PR team because a lawyer can keep them out of jail.
Post a Comment