During the first day of my placement, the Director of the consultancy
provided me with a copy of the organisation's Internet/Email Policy,
Non-disclosure Agreement and Emergency contact forms. Though they served different
purposes, there was a prevalent theme throughout these three documents,
clarifying the organisation’s ethical codes.
According to Hunt and Tirpok, “Ethics codes represent a set of standards
and guidelines for members of the association or organization to work by and
also serve the function of demonstrating responsibility to an often skeptical
public”.[1]
Currently there is no universally accepted code of ethics for global or
Australian public relations industries. This has led to national public
relations organisations – such as the Public Relations Institute of Australia
(PRIA) and Public Relations Society of America (PRSC) – to develop their own
Public Relations Code of Ethics. These codes are used to guide the
organisation’s members and national industry professionals’ behaviours, as well
as to promote self-regulation within the industry.
As these various codes are currently not legally recognised or regulated, they
must rely on – and encourage - individuals in the industry to self-regulate.
Self-regulation is currently the primary governor in the public relations
industry. Wright states “with or without professional codes of conduct most who
practice public relations will choose to be ethical”, due to
self-regulation.[2] And though this may be true, the lack of clear
guidelines and consequences means that what is seen as ethical practice may
significantly differ from person to person, organisation to organisation and
country to country.This can be detrimental for consultants or public relations practitioners working in different organisations, as what can be seen as acceptable in one organisation may not be acceptable in another.To avoid such risk, public relations practitioners can ask their organisations for their codes of conduct and ethical guidelines. If none are in place, public relations organisations and professionals can adopt or take guidance from national public relations agency guidelines and establish their own code of ethics to establish a clear code of personal ethics. This will also help public relations practitioners identify organisations which may not reflect these values, and allow the professional to make an objective decision when deciding whether it may or may not be appropriate to work with an organisation.
In Australia, the Public Relations Institute of Australia (PRIA) Code ofEthics is a prime example of an ethics code developed and adopted by PR agencies
and public relations professionals across the nation alike. Themes throughout
the code include honesty, transparency, professionalism and confidentiality.
These values help establish best practice within the industry and therefore
should be reflected and valued by any public relations professional working
within the industry.
By signing these documents, I was agreeing to adhere to the
organisation’s ethical beliefs and values, an element of the organisation
essential to the Director. As all employees play a crucial role in representing
the organisation, it is essential they all share and reflect through their
behaviours the core values and beliefs of the organisation. By signing an
organisation’s code of ethics, not only are employees made aware of the nature
and values of the organisation stands for, but their responsibility to uphold
these values, beliefs and behaviours as part of the team. As well as providing
employees with an understanding of the organisation and their role within it,
they can also provide ethical direction if a questionable situation was ever to
arise, providing consistency in decision-making and ensuring the organisation’s
working reputation is protected in even the toughest times.
[1] Hunt, T., & Tirpok, A. 1993. Universal ethics code: An idea
whose time has come. Public Relations Review 19 (1): 1-11.
[2] Wright, Donald K. 1993. Enforcement Dilemma: Voluntary Nature of
Public Relations Codes. Public Relations Review 19 (1): 13-20.
Eva Niedzwiedz
16062423
Eva Niedzwiedz
16062423
No comments:
Post a Comment